Dari KULIT hingga Ke-ISINYA

Sebagai penganut Islam, kita patut bersyukur kerana di beri hidayah dan cahaya untuk menerima dan mengakui keESAan Allah swt. Tidak perlu kita membandingkan Islam dengan agama yang lain. Terlalu banyak pekara di dalam Islam yang dapat kita buktikan Islam sebagai agama yang BENAR.

Hebatnya Islam, tidak hanya di permukaaan atau pada fizikalnya. Tetapi Islam perlu dikupas dalam lapisan-lapisan yang lebih dalam umpama lapisan sebiji bawang merah yang ditutup dengan setiap lapisan kulitnya yang nipis.

Kerana itu terdapat terlalu banyak pendapat dan pandangan yang berlainan antara setiap isu yang hadir dalam Islam. Malahan dalam aliran Islam sendiri, terdapat empat aliran yang banyak dibahaskan seperti syariat, tarikat, hakikat dan makrifat. Makanya, setiap pekara di dalam Islam mempunyai empat kupasan yang berbeza dari sudut pandangannya TETAPI masih sama dalam konteks INTInya.

Al Quran sendiri mempunyai BANYAK cerita dan maksud yang boleh dikupas dan ditafsirkan. Baik dari sudut fizikalnya, dari sudut maksudnya dan dari sudut rahsianya yang hanya difahami oleh mereka yang ahli di dalamnya.

Begitu juga PUASA. Dari sudut fizikalnya ia adalah satu rukun Islam yang wajib kita lakukan. Banyak hikmah yang kita perolehi seperti merehatkan tubuh badan dari kerja teruk 11 bulan setiap hari. Selain kita juga dapat merasai betapa peritnya menahan lapar bagi mereka yang tidak berkemampuan.

Tetapi dari sudut lainnya, PUASA adalah satu latihan dan teknik yang ditunjukkan Allah swt untuk kita belajar cara “memprogramkan” semula banyak “tabiat fizikal dan mental” yang ada pada diri manusia tanpa mereka sedari. PUASA adalah satu amalan memprogramkan minda separa sedar yang telah disetkan (atau di AUTO kan) setiap hari oleh individu.

Kalau sebelum ini, setiap pagi kita akan bersarapan, makan tengahari, menghisap rokok, berbual-bual pekara yang tidak elok… Allah menunjukkan manusia bahawa PUASA adalah bukti bagaimana tabiat manusia boleh diprogram semula jika benar-benar menginginkannya.

Pernahkah kita terfikir kenapa PUASA perlu dilakukan selama sebulan? Hari ini kajian sains menunjukkan manusia memerlukan paling kurang 21-30 hari untuk kita mengubah tabiat dan sikap yang kita tidak inginkannya.

Itu uniknya Islam. Maka tak salah pendapat mengatakan kemajuan sains hanya membuktikan kehebatan dan keunggulan agama Islam itu sendiri.

Pernahkah manusia terfikir kenapa diwajibkan sesiapa yang ingin bertahajud untuk tidur barang sebentar?….Kajian sains neuro membuktikan saat awal bangun tidur, gelombang otak berada pada tahap alpha-theta iaitu satu tahap gelombang minda yang sangat baik untuk berdoa, memohon impian, menghubungkan kerohanian, menggunakan kekuatan mental, mengaplikasikan teknik-teknik kuasa minda seperti affirmasi, visualisasi dan sebagainya.

Tak percaya lagi hebatnya Islam?…kerana itu Islam perlu dikupas dari fizikalnya, dari sudut hakikatnya dan ke sudut kerohanian yang mendalam.



Reviewer: Tengku Ahmad Hazri (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)






This book echoes the voice of the new breed of Asians. Aptly entitled 'The Asian Renaissance', Anwar Ibrahim robustly asserts his optimism for Asians. He writes about the "East Asian Economic Miracle", argues for the Asians to stand up for their values and not be held in cultural servitude by the West. This typifies the new Asian, or modern Asian: bold, assertive and liberal. Perhaps this book should come as no surprise, given that he was, when the book was published, the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister of Malaysia. Along with his one-time mentor, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, they can be regarded as the architect of modern Malaysia - politically, economically and culturally.

The Asian Renaissance speaks out just what Asia is moving towards: independence and autonomy from the West. Anwar's vision for Asia thus lies in this book. Nonetheless, read critically and one will find that Anwar presents nothing original here. The abundance of quotations and excerpts is a catastrophic mistake. It leaves the central theme of the book, namely Anwar's thesis of an Asian renaissance, paling into insignificance and lurking beneath the thoughts of other writers.

Throughout the book, Anwar Ibrahim persistently argues for a "middle path" which he purports to apply to virtually every aspect of life, be it in politics or economics. Thus he discredits communism and recognises the impossibility of an absolute democracy. Democracy should be controlled - by religion or something else - so that the people are duly regulated by the law. Well and good. But this straitjacket application for everything necessarily amounts to childish idealism utterly divorced from reality. First, sometimes it is necessary to be radical to progress. Anwar's mentor, Dr. Mahathir even attributes his success story to his ability "to be nasty when others are not".

Those who follow the story of Anwar Ibrahim after his crude dismissal from the Malaysian political landscape in 1998 will recall how ardently he advocates for the abolition of the Internal Security Act which provides for detention without trial. Reading the book in this context one is inclined to concede that he believes the ISA is hostile to democracy. Yet with the upsurge of terrorism, many have come to be aware of such preventive measures. To this extent, democracy at times becomes a fascist convert - what "middle path" can one take? Second, history is always brought about by the clash of two extremes, absolute capitalism vs. communism, religious dogmatism vs. downright secularism and so forth. It is thus not easy to arrive at a "middle path", which Anwar makes it sound so easy to accomplish.

Apparently, Anwar too doesn't subscribe to the 'paternalistic' view of the state where the government is to the people what parents are to the children. Thus he believes that Asians should be given equal freedom as the people in the West does, conveniently ignoring the fact that the people may be incapable of such a vast plethora of rights and liberty, given their "developing" or even "underdeveloped" country status hence many may still have not attained the level of education and maturity of the people in developed countries. But for this Anwar has an answer in the book: he quotes Dr. Sun Yat Sen, "Alas, that is like telling a child that he cannot go to school because he is illiterate!".

Although the book is called "Asian" renaissance, it has a strong Islamic inclination and Anwar writes of Islam as if it has such a profound influence in the Asian continent. Implicitly he is stating his optimism that Islam will dominate Asia and given his rigorous stand to bring Malaysia to the fore of Islamic leadership, that could also mean that he might think of resurrecting Andalusia (which he rightfully glorifies) in Malaysia!

Given these considerations, perhaps it is no exaggeration to say that The Asian Renaissance is a manifesto of a political idealism, at times even realism and pragmatism is threatened. Nevertheless given the spirit and vision deeply ingrained and embodied in the book, that dream might become reality, though not in the near future.


top